His initial training is in foreign language, and his entry?level training is in the exploitation of documents and human sources. This authorization was based on a series of controversial legal memos authored by the Office of Legal Counsel that sought to define torture far more narrowly than before. In some cases, he may be afraid to answer for fear of reprisals by the enemy. CEDs include any piece of recorded information which has been in the possession of a foreign nation and comes into US possession. FM 34-52 (ARMY FIELD MANUAL 34-52), INTELLIGENCE INTERROGATION (28 SEPT 1992)., This manual provides doctrinal guidance, techniques, and procedures governing employment of interrogators as human intelligence (HUMINT) collection assets in support of the commander's intelligence needs. Although a trained interrogator who lacks a foreign language skill can interrogate successfully through an interpreter, the results obtained by the linguistically proficient interrogator will be more timely and comprehensive. Map reading procedures are outlined in FM 21-26. He notes the source's every gesture, word, and voice inflection. Knowledge of a foreign language is necessary since interrogators work primarily with non?English speaking people. The interrogator should be familiar with the social, political, and economic institutions; geography; history; and culture of the target country. A hostile and antagonistic source is most difficult to interrogate. On September 6, 2006, the U.S. Army announced the publication of Field Manual (FM) 2-22.3, "Human Intelligence Collector Operations". The new manual specifically prohibits many of the controversial enhanced interrogation techniques (including "waterboarding") which brought the matter to public attention, and also stipulates that the list is not all-inclusive of prohibited actions. In many cases, he refuses to talk at all and offers a real challenge to the interrogator. The US Army Field Manual on Interrogation, sometimes known by the military nomenclature FM 34-52, is a 177-page manual describing to military interrogators how to conduct effective interrogations while conforming with US and international law. Tools & Services. A more concentrated interrogation effort can be accomplished at higher levels, such as corps or echelons above corps (EAC), where more time is available to exploit hostile and antagonistic sources. FM 34-52 Intelligence Interrogation, 1987. If any of the criteria listed above cannot be met, the interrogator must use the alternate method. Interrogations during the ‘global war on terror’ … Be the first one to write a review. The most essential part of the interrogator's intelligence collection effort is reporting the information obtained. An interrogation involves the interaction of two personalities: the source and the interrogator. Complete Document INTELLIGENCE INTERROGATION. During the questioning phase, OB elements assist the interrogator in verifying the accuracy of the information obtained and can be used as an effective tool to gain new The importance of accurate reporting cannot be overstressed, since interrogation reports are often the basis for tactical decisions and operations. He should keep abreast of major events as they occur in the target country. The interrogator's personal appearance may greatly influence the conduct of the interrogation and the attitude of the source toward the interrogator. Without motivation, other qualities lose their significance. Each interrogation has a definite purpose?to obtain information to satisfy the assigned requirement which contributes to the successful accomplishment of the supported unit's mission. He safeguards military information at all times as well as the source of information. The interrogator must have an exceptional degree of self-control to avoid displays of genuine anger, irritation, sympathy, or weariness which may cause him to lose the initiative during the interrogation. Because of these variations, the interrogator makes a careful study of every source to evaluate his mental, emotional, and physical state and uses it as a basis for interrogation. During the American War on Terror, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld issued a set of so-called "enhanced interrogation techniques" that authorized conduct widely considered to be torture. This knowledge enables him to judge the relative significance of the information he extracts from the source. This often is the case in low-intensity conflict (LIC) where the people may be fearful of insurgent reprisals. Deposit Accounts; Free Newsletters ... FM 34-52 1992 Edition, September 28, 1992. Available to ship in 1-2 days. By knowing the current events affecting the target country, the interrogator will better understand the general situation in the target country, as well as the causes and repercussions. He should not concentrate on the objective to the extent that he overlooks or fails to recognize and exploit other valuable information extracted from the source. Revision of the manual from the previous FM 34-52 Intelligence Interrogation … U.S. military intelligence doctrine states that interrogation is: ... FM 2-22.3 Human Intelligence Collector Operations. An interrogator should possess an interest in human nature and have a personality which will enable him to gain the cooperation of a source. … McCain's amendment passed, and is now called the Detainee Treatment Act. Interrogators must be proficient in all common soldier skills. The US Army Field Manual on Interrogation, sometimes known by the military nomenclature FM 34-52, is a 177 page manual describing to military interrogators how to conduct effective interrogations while conforming with US and international law.It has been replaced by FM 2-22.3 Human Intelligence Collector Operations. An interrogator may lose control during the interrogation by allowing the source to take control of the interrogation. DC. Additionally, the inability to carry out a threat of violence or force renders an interrogator ineffective should the source challenge the threat. Be the first one to write a review. @media only screen and (min-device-width : 320px) and (max-device-width : 480px) { Hence, he must prepare and present both written and oral reports in a clear, complete, concise, and accurate manner. The interrogator must possess, or acquire through training and experience, special skills and knowledge. FM 34-52 Intelligence Interrogation: Pays États-Unis: Genre manuel d'instruction militaire (US Army Field Manual) Version originale; Langue anglais Titre U.S. Army Field Manual 34-52 Intelligence Interrogation: Date de parution 1992: Version française; Date de parution Pas de version française Nombre de pages 177 Chronologie FM 34-52 Intelligence Interrogation: Army Field Manual for 1987 and 1992 - Kindle edition by US Army, United States Government, Veritas, Alethea. ", Torture: Proposed New Army Field Manual Is a First Step but Must Apply to Everyone, Statement of Senator John McCain Amendment on Army Field Manual, Cheney Plan Exempts CIA From Bill Barring Abuse of Detainees, No Place for War Crimes: Redrafting the US Army Interrogation Manual, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=FM_34-52_Intelligence_Interrogation&oldid=865731310, United States Department of Defense publications, Articles with unsourced statements from June 2012, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License, This page was last edited on 25 October 2018, at 19:46. If this occurs, he must postpone the interrogation and reassess the situation. [2] However, the use of force is not to be confused with psychological ploys, verbal trickery, or other nonviolent and noncoercive ruses used by the interrogator in questioning hesitant or uncooperative sources. Interrogators must read maps well enough to map track using source information obtained about locations of enemy activities. It is then obvious that the objective of an interrogation can be changed as necessary or desired. Contact Us. The US Army Field Manual on Interrogation, sometimes known by the military nomenclature FM 34-52, is a 177-page manual describing to military interrogators how to conduct effective interrogations while conforming with US and international law.It has been replaced by FM 2-22.3 Human Intelligence Collector Operations. The interrogator must maintain an objective and a dispassionate attitude, regardless of the emotional reactions he may actually experience, or which he may simulate during the interrogation. FM Intelligence Interrogation – Chapter 3 Obtain a description of the prominent terrain features the source would remember while traveling in this direction. comment. English Select a Language: English; Français; Deutsch; About Us. table of contents . FM 34-52: Intelligence Interrogation Chapter 1 Interrogation and the Interrogator. Intelligence interrogations are of many types, such as the interview, debriefing, and elicitation. Interrogation is the art of questioning and examining a source to obtain the maximum amount of usable information. FM 34-52 Intelligence Interrogation: Department of the Army: Amazon.nl Selecteer uw cookievoorkeuren We gebruiken cookies en vergelijkbare tools om uw winkelervaring te verbeteren, onze services aan te bieden, te begrijpen hoe klanten onze services gebruiken zodat we verbeteringen kunnen aanbrengen, en om advertenties weer te geven. 7 Favorites . It has been replaced by FM 2-22.3 Human Intelligence Collector Operations. There are numerous ways to acquire a document, some of the most common ways are: found in the possession of human sources, on enemy dead, or on the battlefield. He is trained in the techniques and proficiency necessary to exploit human and material sources. He must also adapt himself to the operational environment. He should have received special training on Subversion and Espionage Directed Against the Army (SAEDA). He determines why the source is in a certain mood or why his mood suddenly changed. The interrogator must be knowledgeable and qualified to efficiently and effectively exploit human and material sources which are of potential intelligence interest. Political issues. The interrogator is concerned primarily with two sources of information in his intelligence collection effort: human sources and material sources (mainly captured enemy documents (CEDs)). Manual sets forth basic principles of interrogation doctrine and procedures and techniques applicable to Army intelligence interrogations. A cooperative and friendly source offers little resistance to the interrogation and normally speaks freely on almost any topic introduced, other than that which will tend to incriminate or degrade him personally. OB elements are separate categories by which detailed information is maintained. On June 5, 2006, the Los Angeles Times reported that the Pentagon's revisions would remove the proscription against "humiliating and degrading treatment", and other proscriptions from article 3 of the third Geneva Convention. On April 28, 2005, Defense Secretary Rumsfeld announced that the Army would be revising the manual. Various revisions of the extended techniques were issued. Various revisions of the extended techniques were issued. An interrogator may be motivated by several factors, for example, an interest in human relations, a desire to react to the challenge of personal interplay, an enthusiasm for the collection of information, or just a profound interest in foreign languages and cultures. Interrogation operations contribute to the accomplishment of the supported commander's mission. They are composition, disposition, strength, training, combat effectiveness, tactics, logistics, electronic technical data, and miscellaneous data. FM 34-52 Intelligence Interrogation This information helps the interrogator develop a picture of the source and enables him to select approaches most likely to work. The US Army Field Manual on Interrogation, sometimes known by the military nomenclature FM 34-52, is a 177-page manual describing to military interrogators how to conduct effective interrogations while conforming with US and international law. DC. However, map reading and enemy material and equipment are keys to the performance of interrogator duties. An interrogator must adapt himself to the many and varied personalities which he will encounter. NO 34-52 *FM 34-52 HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Washington. General Ricardo Sanchez, the commander of American ground forces in Iraq, issued his own set of extended techniques after input from Miller and his team, and from Captain Wood. Through the use of his map tracking skills, the interrogator can obtain information on the locations of enemy activities from sources who can read a map. Reviews There are no reviews yet. Army Field Manual No. The interrogator must maintain credibility with the source and friendly forces. Interrogations during the 'global war on terror', Plans to revise the manual to allow extended techniques, FM 2-22.3 Human Intelligence Collector Operations, POW and torture victim during the Vietnam War, New Army Rules May Snarl Talks With McCain on Detainee Issue, Geneva references omitted from revised Army interrogation manual, .pdf version of Field Manual FM 2-22.3, "Human Intelligence Collector Operations. However, the principles of objective, initiative, accuracy, prohibitions against the use of force, and security apply to all types. Whatever the motivation, it is the most significant factor used by an interrogator to achieve success. In either case, the interrogator uses the objective as a basis for planning and conducting He may, then, gradually introduce significant topics into the discussion to gain important insight concerning the conditions and attitudes in the target country. Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Conversely, the interrogator should not accept all information as the truth; he views all information obtained with a degree of doubt. The goal of any interrogation is to obtain usable and reliable information, in a lawful manner and in the least amount of time, which meets intelligence requirements of any echelon of command. If the interrogator's personal manner reflects fairness, strength, and efficiency, the source may prove cooperative and more receptive to questioning. This becomes very clear when one considers that among those persons with whom the interrogator has contact, there are those attempting to collect information for the enemy. The interrogator must have a working knowledge of the US Army's missions, organizations, weapons and equipment, and methods of operation. When time is available and the source appears to be an excellent target for exploitation, he should be isolated and repeatedly interrogated to obtain his cooperation. This manual expands upon the information contained in FM 2-0. Cheney wanted to continue to allow civilian interrogators, working for US intelligence agencies, to use more extended interrogation techniques. Every interrogator should be knowledgeable about his unit's target country, such as armed forces uniforms and insignia, OB information, and country familiarity. Through his knowledge of uniforms, insignia, decorations, and other distinctive devices, the interrogator may be able to determine the rank, branch of service, type of unit, and military experience of a military or paramilitary source. chapter 1 interrogation and the interrogator principles of interrogation sources of information personal qualities specialized skills and knowledge . What does fm 34-52 intelligence interrogation mean? The interrogator, however, is not the final analyst and should not reject or degrade information because it conflicts with previously obtained information. However, the principles of objective, initiative, accuracy, prohibitions against the use of force, and security apply to all types. 5,393 Views . In many cases, he has to conduct interrogations under a variety of unfavorable physical conditions. It is from the source's mood and actions that the interrogator determines how to best proceed with the interrogation. To resume the interrogation, a different interrgoation should conduct the interrogation. He assesses the source correctly by repeating questions at varying intervals. The interrogator, by virtue of his position, possesses a great deal of classified information. If possible, and when time permits, he should attempt to confirm information received and annotate less credible or unproven information. violence, and deprivation useless as interrogation techniques. An interrogator, with patience and tact, is able to terminate an interrogation and later continue further interrogation without arousing apprehension or resentment. Language ability should include a knowledge of military terms, foreign idioms, abbreviations, colloquial and slang usages, and local dialects. Since many sources will readily discuss nonmilitary topics, the interrogator may induce reluctant prisoners to talk by discussing the geography, economics, or politics of the target country. On December 14, 2005, The New York Times reported that the Army Field Manual had been rewritten by the Pentagon. During the American war on terror the Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld issued "enhanced interrogation techniques" that went farther than those authorized in the Army Field Manual. By being able to adapt, he can smoothly shift his techniques and approaches during interrogations. An interrogator must have self?control, patience, and tact when dealing with him. The interrogator requires specialized training in international regulations, security, and neurolinguistics. Rumsfeld intended the extended techniques to be used only on the captives the United States cl… U.S. Army. Drafting of the manual reflected concerns about enhanced interrogation techniques and/or torture, such as water boarding, that followed after a 2003 memo by John Yoo determined that the wartime authority of the U.S. president overrode international agreements against torture. The US Army Field Manual on Interrogation, sometimes known by the military nomenclature FM 34-52, is a 177-page manual describing to military interrogators how to conduct effective interrogations while conforming with US and international law. On July 25, 2005, Senator John McCain – a POW and torture victim during the Vietnam War – submitted an amendment to a military spending bill, intended to restrict all US government interrogators from using interrogation techniques not authorized in the Army Field Manual. Therefore, the use of force is a poor technique, as it yields unreliable results, may damage subsequent collection efforts, and can induce the source to say whatever he thinks the interrogator wants to hear. Washington. Reviews There are no reviews yet. These authorizations were highly controversial, particularly in the wake of the Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse scandal. The interrogator must keep this purpose firmly in mind as he obtains the information. The senior interrogator, depending on the supported commander's priority intelligence requirements (PIR) and information requirements (IR), decides which of these sources will be more effective in the intelligence collection effort. The psychological techniques and principles outlined should neither be confused with, nor construed to be synonymous with, unauthorized techniques such as brainwashing, mental torture, or any other form of mental coercion to include drugs. It is consistent with doctrine in FM 3-0, FM 5-0, FM 6-0, and JP 2-0. FM 34-52: Intelligence Interrogation Chapter 3 Interrogation Process. The interrogator encounters many sources who vary greatly in personality, social class, civilian occupation, military specialty, and political and religious beliefs. 809 Views . FM 34-52 Intelligence Interrogation. Some of the more common subjects of interest to the interrogator include small arms, infantry support weapons, artillery, aircraft, vehicles, communications equipment, and NBC defense.

Ragnarok Holy Dagger Quest, Crime Rate In Cape Coral, Florida, Lori Erica Ruff Documentary, New Order 10: Etheric Horus, Under The Fee-for-service System, Providers Had The Incentive To, Best Class For Shifter 5e, Perch Fishing Lake St Clair 2020,